智能体工程 vs. 随性编程之争

⌘K

Change language Switch ThemeSign In

Narrow Mode

Agentic Engineering vs. Vibe Coding Debate ==========================================

Agentic Engineering vs. Vibe Coding Debate ==========================================  ### Garry Tan

@garrytan

唱衰者尽管唱衰，实干家只管建造。

!Image 3: Peter Steinberger 🦞

#### Peter Steinberger 🦞

@steipete · 4h ago @notsunsakis @bcherny 别把它叫做“随性编程”——那代表着 YOLO 式地胡乱敲键盘，不思考、不进行工程设计、构建、测试、调试和迭代。这应该是智能体工程，或者就叫……编程。我们行动得更快了，但它仍然很难。

87

81

1,096

39.9K

Mar 14, 2026, 7:15 PM View on X

10 Replies

5 Retweets

30 Likes

3,078 Views  Garry Tan @garrytan

One Sentence Summary

Garry Tan supports the distinction between 'agentic engineering' and 'vibe coding,' emphasizing the need for rigorous building and testing.

Summary

Quoting a discussion on the terminology of modern AI development, Garry Tan aligns himself with the 'agentic engineering' camp. The tweet argues against the term 'vibe coding' (often associated with low-effort, trial-and-error coding), asserting that building with AI still requires traditional engineering discipline, including thinking, testing, debugging, and iterating.

AI Score

75

Influence Score 10

Published At Today

Language

English

Tags

Agentic Engineering

Vibe Coding

Engineering Discipline

AI Development HomeArticlesPodcastsVideosTweets

Agentic Engineering vs. Vibe Coding Debate | BestBlogs.dev ===============