← 回總覽

AI 开发中:图表是有效工程计划评审的关键

📅 2026-03-18 11:58 Garry Tan 人工智能 4 分鐘 4169 字 評分: 80
工程评审 AI 开发 软件质量 图表 加里·谭
📌 一句话摘要 加里·谭强调,在工程计划评审中要求提供图表是一个及早发现 bug 的关键“秘诀”,这在应对 AI 生成代码的挑战时尤为重要。 📝 详细摘要 针对一条批评 AI 生成代码规范过于详细的引用推文,Y Combinator 首席执行官加里·谭提出了一项实用解决方案:利用“/plan-eng-review”技能。他强调,这一流程成功的“秘诀”在于始终要求提供图表(包括用户流程、数据流、分支和边缘情况)。在编写大量代码之前,创建这些图表的行为本身就能帮助“找出并解决 bug”,从而有效应对管理 AI 生成代码质量的挑战,并在模型产出大量“粗糙代码”之前对其进行引导。这为确保 AI 辅
Skip to main content ![Image 1: LogoBestBlogs](https://www.bestblogs.dev/ "BestBlogs.dev")Toggle navigation menu Toggle navigation menuArticlesPodcastsVideosTweetsSourcesNewsletters

⌘K

Change language Switch ThemeSign In

Narrow Mode

Diagrams as a Key to Effective Engineering Plan Review in AI Development

Diagrams as a Key to Effective Engineering Plan Review in AI Development

![Image 2: Garry Tan](https://www.bestblogs.dev/en/tweets?sourceId=SOURCE_ea220f14) ### Garry Tan

@garrytan

/plan-ceo-review and /plan-eng-review skills basically gets you 90% of the way to done most of the time

the secret in plan-eng-review is that you can always ask for a diagram, and the act of creating the diagram (user flow, data flow, branching, edge cases) shakes out the bugs

!Image 3: dex

#### dex

@dexhorthy · 17h ago

damn this is so good and encapsulates everything I've been seeing/saying in the last few months

  • a spec that is sufficiently detailed to generate code with a reliable degree of quality is roughly the same length and detail as the code itself
  • so don't review those things, just review the code at that point, if you care enough about that level of abstraction
  • unless you're vibing side projects or prototypes (yes, even zero-to-one software), you ABSOLUTELY SHOULD care about the code at that level of abstraction
  • you need to find SOME way to get more leverage over coding agents though, because just reading all that code is a pain, esp when a lot of it is slop
  • the default/dare-i-say-decel way is to go back to "i own the execution, and give little things to the agent, check it along the way"
  • the accel-but-safe-way is to find something - NOT A SPEC (the word "spec" is broken anyway) - NOT 3 INVOCATIONS OF AskUserQuestion - that lets you resteer the model before it slops out N-thousand LOC Show More
20

14

238

44.8K

Mar 18, 2026, 3:58 AM View on X

19 Replies

7 Retweets

107 Likes

14.7K Views G Garry Tan @garrytan

One Sentence Summary

Garry Tan highlights that asking for diagrams during engineering plan reviews is a crucial 'secret' to identify bugs early, especially relevant in the context of AI-generated code challenges.

Summary

Building on a quoted tweet that critiques overly detailed specs for AI-generated code, Garry Tan, CEO of Y Combinator, offers a practical solution: leveraging '/plan-eng-review' skills. He emphasizes that the 'secret' to success in this process is to always ask for diagrams (user flow, data flow, branching, edge cases). The act of creating these diagrams helps to 'shake out the bugs' before extensive code is written, effectively addressing the challenge of managing AI-generated code quality and steering models before they produce large amounts of 'slop'. This provides a concrete, high-leverage method for ensuring quality in AI-assisted software development.

AI Score

80

Influence Score 37

Published At Today

Language

English

Tags

Engineering Review

AI Development

Software Quality

Diagrams

Garry Tan HomeArticlesPodcastsVideosTweets

Diagrams as a Key to Effective Engineering Plan Review in...

查看原文 → 發佈: 2026-03-18 11:58:24 收錄: 2026-03-18 14:00:41

🤖 問 AI

針對這篇文章提問,AI 會根據文章內容回答。按 Ctrl+Enter 送出。