← 回總覽

Intuit 在法庭上胜诉 FTC,终结了对“免费” TurboTax 广告的限制

📅 2026-03-24 03:05 Jon Brodkin 商业科技 3 分鐘 3280 字 評分: 80
Intuit FTC 科技政策 法律 TurboTax
📌 一句话摘要 美国上诉法院裁定 FTC 针对 Intuit “免费” TurboTax 广告的行政执法无效,并裁定此类虚假广告索赔必须在联邦法院审理,而非通过该机构的内部程序。 📝 详细摘要 美国第五巡回上诉法院裁定 Intuit 胜诉,推翻了 FTC 此前旨在限制 Intuit “免费” TurboTax 广告的行政命令。法院援引最高法院在 SEC v. Jarkesy 一案中的判例,裁定 FTC 用于裁决虚假广告索赔的内部行政程序违反了宪法权力分立原则和陪审团审判权。虽然这对 Intuit 来说是一次重大的程序性胜利,但法院指出,完全驳回此案为时尚早,因为 FTC 仍可在联邦法院继续

Sign in to use highlight and note-taking features for a better reading experience. Sign in now

An appeals court invalidated the Biden-era Federal Trade Commission’s attempt to punish Intuit for allegedly deceptive ads that pitched TurboTax as free.

Under then-Chair Lina Khan, the FTC determined in 2024 that the TurboTax maker violated US law with deceptive advertising and ordered it to stop telling consumers, without more obvious disclaimers, that TurboTax or other products are free. The FTC’s chief administrative law judge had previously found that Intuit’s ads violated prohibitions on deceptive advertising because the firm “advertised to consumers that they could file their taxes online for free using TurboTax, when in truth, for approximately two-thirds of taxpayers, the advertised claim was false.”

Intuit appealed in the conservative-leaning US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit and got a resounding victory on Friday in a 3–0 ruling issued by a panel of judges. “Following the Supreme Court’s decision in _SEC v. Jarkesy_, we hold that adjudication of a deceptive advertising claim before an administrative law judge violated the constitutional separation of powers,” the 5th Circuit panel said.

The Supreme Court’s June 2024 ruling in _Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy_ held that the SEC system for issuing fines violated the right to a jury trial. The 5th Circuit panel said the _Jarkesy_ decision confirms that the FTC must pursue deceptive advertising claims in courts rather than its own administrative process.

Intuit says it’s “thrilled”

The ruling, written by Circuit Judge Edith Jones, said that dismissing the case against Intuit would be premature because the claims can be tried in court. Jones wrote:

> Intuit seeks reversal of the FTC’s cease-and-desist order with instructions to dismiss. Dismissal is premature. We hold that FTC’s enforcement action must proceed in federal court. Several consequences may follow from this: the standard of proof required on remand may be elevated from substantial evidence to a preponderance; the agency will have to explain the necessity of any order, given that Intuit stopped running the offending ads years ago; and the practicability, scope, and longevity of a cease-and-desist order will have to be reconsidered.

Intuit now faces more friendly regulators under the Trump administration than it did under Biden. Trump fired both Democratic members of the FTC, leaving it with only Republican commissioners, and the Supreme Court has so far declined to overturn Trump’s action.

查看原文 → 發佈: 2026-03-24 03:05:58 收錄: 2026-03-24 06:00:26

🤖 問 AI

針對這篇文章提問,AI 會根據文章內容回答。按 Ctrl+Enter 送出。