⌘K
Change language Switch ThemeSign In
Narrow Mode
Clarification on LiteLLM Breach and Delve's Role
Clarification on LiteLLM Breach and Delve's Role
 ### Gergely Orosz@GergelyOrosz
Also, to spell it out: Delve did not "secure" anything.
The screenshot is from LiteLLM.
LiteLLM got hit by a security breach. Delve didn't secure anything, despite what they advertised (and still advertise)
Delve misrepresented too many things IMO 👎 x.com/GergelyOrosz/s…Q
#### Gergely Orosz
@GergelyOrosz · 3d ago
Oh damn, I thought this WAS a joke
... but no, LiteLLM really was "Secured by Delve" (the company that rubber stamped all of these audits, and seems to have been on the edge of fraudlent auditing, but useless for sure)
And so unspririsingly LiteLLM was compromised, badly Show More
83
244
3,027
373.5K
Mar 27, 2026, 11:03 PM View on X
4 Replies
0 Retweets
33 Likes
7,683 Views  Gergely Orosz @GergelyOrosz
One Sentence Summary
Gergely clarifies that LiteLLM was compromised despite Delve's 'Secured by' branding, emphasizing that Delve's marketing claims regarding security are misleading.
Summary
Following up on the Delve critique, Gergely clarifies that the LiteLLM security breach occurred despite the 'Secured by Delve' branding. He asserts that Delve misrepresented its actual security contribution, further undermining the company's credibility.
AI Score
80
Influence Score 5
Published At Yesterday
Language
English
Tags
LiteLLM
Delve
Security Breach
Compliance HomeArticlesPodcastsVideosTweets