⌘K
Change language Switch ThemeSign In
Narrow Mode
You’re not supposed to get it right
!Image 3: UX Collective UX Collective @Rita Kind-Envy
One Sentence Summary
The author reframes the anxiety of UX design challenges, arguing that success lies not in producing a perfect solution, but in demonstrating a structured, collaborative, and thoughtful problem-solving process.
Summary
The article explores the common anxiety surrounding UX design challenges, particularly at major tech companies like Google. The author, a UX writer, admits to the fear of failing to produce a 'perfect' solution within a constrained timeframe. They argue that the true purpose of these challenges is not to reach the 'right' answer, but to demonstrate how a candidate thinks, handles ambiguity, and communicates design decisions. By shifting the focus from visual perfection to the underlying process, candidates can better manage the pressure and showcase the critical thinking skills that interviewers are actually evaluating.
Main Points
* 1. Shift focus from output to processThe primary goal of a design challenge is not to deliver a flawless final product, but to demonstrate your ability to think critically, structure your approach, and solve problems under pressure. * 2. Embrace ambiguity as part of the testInterviewers are looking for how you navigate uncertainty and make informed decisions, rather than expecting you to have all the answers immediately. * 3. Communication outweighs visual polishWhile visuals are important, your ability to articulate your reasoning, explain your trade-offs, and collaborate with the interviewer is the most critical factor in a successful design challenge.
Metadata
AI Score
82
Website uxdesign.cc
Published At Today
Length 251 words (about 2 min)
Sign in to use highlight and note-taking features for a better reading experience. Sign in now
Member-only story
I left the Google design challenge convinced I had failed — and I passed. This is what actually matters in these interviews.
 Rita Kind-Envy7 min read 2 hours ago
[](https://medium.com/m/signin?actionUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2F_%2Fvote%2Fuser-experience-design-1%2Fc0c6d7590bc5&operation=register&redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fuxdesign.cc%2Fyoure-not-supposed-to-get-it-right-c0c6d7590bc5&user=Rita+Kind-Envy&userId=b95d4ccb538e&source=---header_actions--c0c6d7590bc5---------------------clap_footer------------------)
--
1
[](https://medium.com/m/signin?actionUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2F_%2Fbookmark%2Fp%2Fc0c6d7590bc5&operation=register&redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fuxdesign.cc%2Fyoure-not-supposed-to-get-it-right-c0c6d7590bc5&source=---header_actions--c0c6d7590bc5---------------------bookmark_footer------------------)
Share
Press enter or click to view image in full size Portrait of Thomas Cromwell, detail, by Hans Holbein the Younger
It was terrifying to do a design challenge as a UX writer.
I knew I was OK talking about my experience, showing off my cases, and felt more or less confident in the earlier stages of the interview process, but… coming up with an actually useful solution on the spot? Not my specialty.
Not because I can’t draw boxes in Figma (contrary to popular belief, UX writers _can_ draw them), but because, if pushed to brainstorm a user journey, I was scared to make a wrong assumption and build on top of it. It was also scary to miss the chance to recover from a mistake and not get to the “right” answer.
And the worst part is being judged by what’s visible. Because what’s visible tends to carry more weight. Boxes, flows, and structured screens make the design — and the author’s thinking — feel _convincing_. Visuals create an instant sense of clarity. Content doesn’t hit like that.
Overall, for me, a design challenge is a nightmare because you’re expected to simulate depth at speed — to make, in one hour, decisions that normally take days, and make them look intentional. I hate working on the…
!Image 5: UX Collective UX Collective @Rita Kind-Envy
One Sentence Summary
The author reframes the anxiety of UX design challenges, arguing that success lies not in producing a perfect solution, but in demonstrating a structured, collaborative, and thoughtful problem-solving process.
Summary
The article explores the common anxiety surrounding UX design challenges, particularly at major tech companies like Google. The author, a UX writer, admits to the fear of failing to produce a 'perfect' solution within a constrained timeframe. They argue that the true purpose of these challenges is not to reach the 'right' answer, but to demonstrate how a candidate thinks, handles ambiguity, and communicates design decisions. By shifting the focus from visual perfection to the underlying process, candidates can better manage the pressure and showcase the critical thinking skills that interviewers are actually evaluating.
Main Points
* 1. Shift focus from output to process
The primary goal of a design challenge is not to deliver a flawless final product, but to demonstrate your ability to think critically, structure your approach, and solve problems under pressure.
* 2. Embrace ambiguity as part of the test
Interviewers are looking for how you navigate uncertainty and make informed decisions, rather than expecting you to have all the answers immediately.
* 3. Communication outweighs visual polish
While visuals are important, your ability to articulate your reasoning, explain your trade-offs, and collaborate with the interviewer is the most critical factor in a successful design challenge.
Key Quotes
* I left the Google design challenge convinced I had failed --- and I passed. This is what actually matters in these interviews. * A design challenge is a nightmare because you're expected to simulate depth at speed --- to make, in one hour, decisions that normally take days, and make them look intentional.
AI Score
82
Website uxdesign.cc
Published At Today
Length 251 words (about 2 min)
Tags
UX Design
Design Challenge
Career Development
Interview Tips
UX Writing
Related Articles
* Mel Robbins: How to Get Ahead in 2026 When Everything Feels Uncertain * Leading design teams is easy， but we made it complicated * The calm and charm of cosy games in a chaotic world * Stairways to nowhere: why AI makes blueprints matter more than ever * 14 More lessons from 14 years at Google * The three thirds * You’re still designing for an architecture that no longer exists * Atlassian CEO on the SaaS Apocalypse， AI Agents & What Comes Next * The art of influence: The single most important skill left that AI can’t replace | Jessica Fain * “I haven’t written a single line of front-end code in 3 months”: Notion’s prototype playground HomeArticlesPodcastsVideosTweets