⌘K
Change language Switch ThemeSign In
Narrow Mode
Security Limitations of GStack's /cso Tool
Security Limitations of GStack's /cso Tool
 ### Garry Tan@garrytan
/cso in GStack is no replacement for a penetration test but it will help
#### Werner Kasselman
@wernerk_au · 2h ago UPDATED Updated: How we used sqry's code graph + 3 LLMs to find 30 security issues in @garrytan's gstack. Most of the fixes in the latest security wave came from our two PRs, landed with attribution. Grateful for the open source and the recognition.
"How We Used AI Agents to Security-Audit an Open Source Project" by Verivus OSS Releases #DEVCommunity dev.to/verivusossrele…Show More
1
0
2
4,282
Apr 6, 2026, 8:03 AM View on X
5 Replies
3 Retweets
18 Likes
4,089 Views G Garry Tan @garrytan
One Sentence Summary
Garry Tan clarifies that the /cso feature in GStack assists with security but is not a replacement for professional penetration testing.
Summary
Responding to a user who utilized AI agents to perform a security audit on GStack, Garry Tan provides a crucial technical clarification. He acknowledges the utility of the /cso tool in identifying issues but explicitly warns that it does not replace a comprehensive penetration test, emphasizing the need for rigorous security practices even when using AI-assisted auditing tools.
AI Score
86
Influence Score 5
Published At Today
Language
English
Tags
GStack
Security
Penetration Testing
AI Agents
Open Source HomeArticlesPodcastsVideosTweets