← 回總覽

NASA 的登月飞船和火箭看起来运行良好,那么着陆器呢?

📅 2026-04-07 02:59 Eric Berger 商业科技 8 分鐘 8920 字 評分: 80
NASA 阿耳忒弥斯 太空探索 SpaceX 蓝色起源
📌 一句话摘要 NASA 正在评估 SpaceX 和蓝色起源(Blue Origin)的提案,旨在通过取消月球门户(Lunar Gateway)对接要求来加快载人着陆系统(HLS)的时间表,目前正在等待对猎户座(Orion)飞船影响的分析结果。 📝 详细摘要 本文报道了 NASA 阿耳忒弥斯(Artemis)II 号任务的进展以及关键的下一阶段:载人着陆系统(HLS)的开发。为了加快进度,NASA 已经取消了着陆器与月球门户对接的要求。NASA 目前正在审查 SpaceX 和蓝色起源的提案,这些提案涉及替代性的任务设计,例如在近地轨道与猎户座飞船对接。在最终确定计划之前,该机构正在进行严格
Skip to main content ![Image 1: LogoBestBlogs](https://www.bestblogs.dev/ "BestBlogs.dev")Toggle navigation menu Toggle navigation menuArticlesPodcastsVideosTweetsSourcesNewsletters

⌘K

Change language Switch ThemeSign In

Narrow Mode

NASA's Moon ship and rocket seem to be working well, so what about the landers?

!Image 2: Ars Technica Ars Technica @Eric Berger

One Sentence Summary

NASA is evaluating proposals from SpaceX and Blue Origin to accelerate the Human Landing System (HLS) timeline by removing the Lunar Gateway docking requirement, pending analysis of impacts on the Orion spacecraft.

Summary

The article reports on the progress of NASA's Artemis II mission and the critical next phase: the development of Human Landing Systems (HLS). To expedite the timeline, NASA has removed the requirement for landers to dock with the Lunar Gateway. NASA is currently reviewing proposals from SpaceX and Blue Origin, which involve alternative mission designs such as docking with Orion in low-Earth orbit. The agency is conducting rigorous thermal and power analyses to ensure these design changes are compatible with the Orion spacecraft before finalizing the plans.

Main Points

* 1. NASA is accelerating the HLS timeline by removing the Lunar Gateway docking requirement.By eliminating the need for docking in a near-rectilinear halo orbit, NASA aims to simplify mission architecture and speed up development for both SpaceX and Blue Origin. * 2. The agency is currently conducting compatibility analyses between new lander designs and the Orion spacecraft.NASA must ensure that proposed mission changes, such as alternative docking procedures, do not compromise the power and thermal systems of the Orion capsule. * 3. Official plans remain under review, with potential shifts toward LEO docking or non-refueling architectures.While details are not yet finalized, the industry is moving toward more flexible mission designs to meet the aggressive Artemis schedule.

Metadata

AI Score

80

Website arstechnica.com

Published At Today

Length 377 words (about 2 min)

Sign in to use highlight and note-taking features for a better reading experience. Sign in now

[](https://www.bestblogs.dev/article/8e8cb47d)

As we have been reporting on Ars, NASA’s Artemis II lunar mission has been going rather well so far. Of course, Orion’s big test is yet to come with the fiery reentry through Earth’s atmosphere on Friday. But so far, it’s looking like the rocket and spaceship needed for a lunar landing are getting there for NASA.

The biggest remaining piece of the architecture, therefore, is a lunar lander. Known in NASA parlance as the Human Landing System, or HLS, the space agency has contracted with SpaceX for its Starship vehicle and Blue Origin and its Blue Moon lander.

Last year NASA asked both companies for options to accelerate their lunar landers, and both replied that not having to dock with the Lunar Gateway in a highly elliptical orbit, known as near-rectilinear halo orbit, would help a lot. So the space agency has removed that requirement.

Beyond this, we don’t know much officially. NASA and the companies have not spoken publicly about their revised plans, but Ars reported a month ago that Blue Origin had a plan that did not involve orbital refueling, and SpaceX was looking at docking Starship with Orion in low-Earth orbit.

To get NASA’s official view on all of this, Ars recently interviewed Lori Glaze, who leads NASA’s deep space exploration program. Ars: _You guys haven’t talked much about the plans to publicly accelerate the Human Landing Systems. Is there going to be a time when you do that?_ Lori Glaze: Yeah, I think there will be a time we do that. You know, we’ve got their proposals. They’ve each brought in some good proposals. They’ve taken this very seriously. They’ve brought proposals to us about simplifying requirements so that they can really pull things in and accelerate. The key thing that we have to complete is the analysis of the interactions with Orion, looking at power and thermal for the Orion system, and making sure that the whole case closes; that these changes we might make to the mission design aren’t going to break what we have with Orion. So we’ve got to all work together. And I think once we’ve completed that, which hopefully won’t take too much longer, we’ll be able to home in on some specific solutions for each.

!Image 3: Ars Technica Ars Technica @Eric Berger

One Sentence Summary

NASA is evaluating proposals from SpaceX and Blue Origin to accelerate the Human Landing System (HLS) timeline by removing the Lunar Gateway docking requirement, pending analysis of impacts on the Orion spacecraft.

Summary

The article reports on the progress of NASA's Artemis II mission and the critical next phase: the development of Human Landing Systems (HLS). To expedite the timeline, NASA has removed the requirement for landers to dock with the Lunar Gateway. NASA is currently reviewing proposals from SpaceX and Blue Origin, which involve alternative mission designs such as docking with Orion in low-Earth orbit. The agency is conducting rigorous thermal and power analyses to ensure these design changes are compatible with the Orion spacecraft before finalizing the plans.

Main Points

* 1. NASA is accelerating the HLS timeline by removing the Lunar Gateway docking requirement.

By eliminating the need for docking in a near-rectilinear halo orbit, NASA aims to simplify mission architecture and speed up development for both SpaceX and Blue Origin.

* 2. The agency is currently conducting compatibility analyses between new lander designs and the Orion spacecraft.

NASA must ensure that proposed mission changes, such as alternative docking procedures, do not compromise the power and thermal systems of the Orion capsule.

* 3. Official plans remain under review, with potential shifts toward LEO docking or non-refueling architectures.

While details are not yet finalized, the industry is moving toward more flexible mission designs to meet the aggressive Artemis schedule.

Key Quotes

* The key thing that we have to complete is the analysis of the interactions with Orion, looking at power and thermal for the Orion system, and making sure that the whole case closes. * They've brought proposals to us about simplifying requirements so that they can really pull things in and accelerate.

AI Score

80

Website arstechnica.com

Published At Today

Length 377 words (about 2 min)

Tags

NASA

Artemis

Space Exploration

SpaceX

Blue Origin

Related Articles

* Claude Plans First AI-Driven Path on Mars for Perseverance Rover * Google Announces Gemma 4 Open AI Models, Switches to Apache 2.0 License * Supreme Court rejects Sony's attempt to kick music pirates off the Internet are not liable for user copyright infringement unless they actively induce such activity or tailor their services to facilitate it, effectively protecting ISPs from mass-termination mandates.") HomeArticlesPodcastsVideosTweets

NASA's Moon ship and rocket seem to be working well, so w...

查看原文 → 發佈: 2026-04-07 02:59:01 收錄: 2026-04-07 06:00:31

🤖 問 AI

針對這篇文章提問,AI 會根據文章內容回答。按 Ctrl+Enter 送出。