← 回總覽

马克·安德森支持 AI 解决计算机安全危机的观点

📅 2026-04-11 07:48 Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 人工智能 2 分鐘 1504 字 評分: 86
AI 安全 网络安全 形式化验证 代码审计 Marc Andreessen
📌 一句话摘要 马克·安德森转发并赞同(Co-sign)了 Perry Metzger 的观点,认为 AI 驱动的代码审计和形式化验证将终结长达数十年的安全危机,而非造成永久性的不安全。 📝 详细摘要 马克·安德森对 Perry Metzger 关于 AI 影响网络安全的详尽论述表示支持。核心论点在于,AI 发现漏洞和执行高劳动强度的“形式化验证”的能力并非威胁,而是解决有限数量既有安全漏洞的方案。该观点反驳了“永久不安全”的叙事,认为 AI 将实现此前人类无法完成的代码库全面审计,一旦初始的漏洞发现阶段完成,最终将引领一个更加安全的数字时代。 📊 文章信息 AI 评分:86 来源:Ma

The reaction people are having to AIs that can find bugs in code is fascinating. Finally, we have the capacity to fix the crisis in computer security we’ve had for decades, and everyone is treating it like it’s a tragedy. A central mistake here is that people regard this as “no one will ever be safe again” rather than “there will be a brief period when we get rid of most of the problems.”

People seem to be acting as though there will always be more security holes for these systems to find, forever, and so there can never be safety, but that’s not the way this works at all.

There are not an infinite number of computer security bugs in existence. It is only felt that way because we haven’t had the ability to carefully audit absolutely everything. There are also techniques that we could never afford to use before, like formal verification, that will let us vanquish a lot of the problems forever, but which require AI to really take advantage of because they are simply too labor-intensive for human beings.

This is not the beginning of some era of permanent insecurity where no one can ever feel safe again. It’s the end of a long period of insecurity where no one had any safety.

The problem is, certain companies are hyping this as “these tools are too dangerous to let anyone have!” Which of course means that people won’t be able to audit their own code to get rid of their bugs before they release software. Hopefully that too is also temporary. It would indeed be tragic if it wasn’t.

查看原文 → 發佈: 2026-04-11 07:48:17 收錄: 2026-04-11 10:00:31

🤖 問 AI

針對這篇文章提問,AI 會根據文章內容回答。按 Ctrl+Enter 送出。