Tianqiao Chen on Compliance and Governance for Global AI ...
Skip to main content Search Ctrl+K
Change language Switch ThemeSign In
Curated ExploreDaily BriefWeekly PicksSources SettingsCollapse
Narrow Mode
Tianqiao Chen on Compliance and Governance for Global AI Companies
Tianqiao Chen on Compliance and Governance for Global AI Companies
 宝玉@dotey
陈天桥的推文，借 Manus 的事谈在监管、地缘政治和公众审视都在快速变化的时代，跨多个司法管辖区建一家 AI 公司，到底需要什么。
他的主要观点：
第一，AI 的最高目标不是模仿人类，而是扩展人类的发现和认知边界。这个判断来自他和太太过去十多年通过 TCCI（陈天桥雒芊芊研究院）做脑科学研究的经验，不是空谈。
第二，AI 和人类智能都应该服务于全人类，不是服务于某一个国家。基于这个前提，构建一个能在不同司法管辖区负责任运营的组织，不是可选项，而是工作本身的一部分。
第三，也是最关键的一句，明显指向 Manus：任何一次性的转移都不是真正的解决方案。（"no one-time transfer is a real solution"）Manus 从北京搬到新加坡、试图通过架构腾挪“洗干净”自己，在陈天桥看来是走不通的。
第四，他认为真正重要的是持续调整，在组织结构、边界和责任上始终保持清晰，让组织随时间变得更有韧性。他想建的公司是“思考严谨、结构清晰、全球视野、合规内置于设计”。
陈天桥自己正在运营跨境 AI 业务，MiroMind 总部在硅谷红木城，团队 80% 以上是博士研究员，EverMind 做 AI 记忆系统，TCCI 在上海、加州理工都有布局。他要传递的信号是：同样是华人创办、全球运营的 AI 公司，存在一条不靠“新加坡洗白”、而是靠合规设计和持续治理走通的路。
但他没有展开说自己的公司具体怎么做到合规内置。Show More
#### TianqiaoChen
@tianqiao_chen · 5h ago
The discussion around Manus has made me reflect on a broader question: what does it really take to build an AI company across multiple jurisdictions in a world where regulation, geopolitics, and public scrutiny are changing faster than most companies can adapt?I believe this will become one of the defining challenges for the next generation of AI companies.
For more than a decade, my wife and I have supported brain science through TCCI （Chen Institute）, and that work has shaped how I think about intelligence and its role in humanity’s future. It has also shaped my view of AI: its highest purpose is NOT simply to imitate human beings but to expand human discovery and understanding. Both AI and human intelligence are to serve humanity as a whole, not just any single country, building an organization that can operate responsibly across different jurisdictions is not optional — it is part of the work itself.
This is the kind of company we want to build: rigorous in its thinking, clear in its structure, global in its outlook, and compliant by design. In a world like this, no one-time transfer is a real solution. What matters is continuous adjustment to preserve clarity — in structure, in boundaries, and in responsibility — so that the organization can become more resilient over time.Show More
10
8
56
73.2K
Apr 22, 2026, 10:05 PM View on X
24 Replies
21 Retweets
142 Likes
Follow
One Sentence Summary
Baoyu interprets Tianqiao Chen's views on cross-border AI operations, emphasizing 'built-in compliance' and continuous governance over simple 'architectural transfers.'
Summary
This tweet provides a deep analysis of Tianqiao Chen's reflections on global AI operations triggered by the Manus incident. Key points include: AI should expand human cognition rather than just imitate humans; cross-border operation should be a core part of organizational design; and opposition to one-time transfers (like moving to Singapore) to evade regulation. Instead, Chen advocates for 'compliance by design' and continuous organizational resilience to meet geopolitical challenges. The tweet also contrasts the global layout models of Chen's MiroMind and TCCI.
AI Screening
88
Influence Score 52
Published Yesterday
Language
Chinese
Tags
Tianqiao Chen
Manus
AI Regulation
Globalization