Title: 端對談｜從中國最高法院的認同，到華人彩虹遊行，中國 LGBTQ+的權益在變好嗎？ | BestBlogs.dev
URL Source: https://www.bestblogs.dev/article/bb4feaac?amp%3Butm_medium=feed&%3Butm_campaign=resources&%3Bentry=rss_article_item
Published Time: 2026-07-06 19:47:02
Markdown Content: Skip to main contentAudio 2 
Search Ctrl+K
Change language Switch ThemeSign In
[](https://www.bestblogs.dev/en/explore/brief "Daily Brief")[](https://www.bestblogs.dev/en/explore/newsletter "Weekly Picks")[](https://www.bestblogs.dev/en/explore/topics "Topics")[](https://www.bestblogs.dev/en/worldcup "World Cup Special")
[](https://www.bestblogs.dev/en/settings "Settings")[](https://www.bestblogs.dev/en/docs "Help Center")
Narrow Mode
80
端對談｜從中國最高法院的認同，到華人彩虹遊行，中國 LGBTQ+的權益在變好嗎？
Using the Supreme People's Court's first written confirmation that discrimination based on sexual orientation is legally prohibited as a starting point, this article invites experts to discuss the current state of LGBTQ+ rights and action strategies in China, juxtaposing the phenomenon of Chinese people participating in overseas Pride parades with the cancellation of domestic events. Follow·
Today·867 words (about 4 min)
AI Summary & Key Points
Summary
The article begins with the contrast between the large number of Chinese faces appearing at the Bangkok Pride Parade this June and the account suspensions of domestic LGBTQ+ NGOs' WeChat public accounts. It cites the Supreme People's Court's Research Office replying to a letter in May, explicitly stating that 'the law prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression'—the first time the national judicial system has acknowledged this principle in writing. However, the news was quickly censored and deleted, and the account that published it was banned. The author invites two long-time observers of this issue—researcher Tom and grassroots organizer Ren Hao—to discuss from perspectives including legal precedents, gray zones, and action strategies, attempting to clarify the tension between official signals and actual conditions. Since the full article is behind a paywall, only the introduction can be analyzed; the subsequent in-depth dialogue cannot be assessed.
Main Points
* 1. China's Supreme People's Court first confirmed in writing that the law prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation.
On May 8, the Supreme People's Court's Research Office replied to a petition, explicitly stating that the law prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression, and that courts provide equal protection of the legitimate rights and interests of sexual minorities. This is the first official written statement from the national judicial system.
* 2. This judicial signal was quickly removed by internet censorship.
After the news spread on social platforms, the WeChat public account that published it was banned, and related information was blocked, highlighting the contradictions and instability in the official stance.
* 3. Chinese participation in overseas Pride parades has increased, while domestic activities are being suppressed.
The Bangkok Pride Parade featured numerous hand-painted signs in simplified Chinese, showing that Chinese people have become a major overseas participating group. In contrast, multiple domestic LGBTQ+ NGOs' WeChat accounts were suspended during the same period.
Sign in to highlight text and take notes as you read. Sign in now
「國產拉拉」、「沒有性少數就沒有新中國」、「媽祖託夢，拒絕騙婚，追求自己美好gay生」。
今年6月，這些簡體中文的手寫牌出現在曼谷驕傲月遊行上。這是活動復辦的第四年，華人已經成為主要的海外參與群體之一。但當華人面孔越來越頻繁地出現在曼谷、東京等地的驕傲遊行中時，中國境內的驕傲月線下活動卻接連被取消——也是發生在這個6月，中國國內好幾個彩虹NGO的微信公眾號被封號。
作為全球最多的 LGBTQ+ 群體所在國之一——有研究估計，中國的性少數群體人數達4000萬到7000萬人——政府的態度常常消極，但也有曖昧和張力。一個積極的官方信號在5月引起熱議：一張網傳截圖顯示，5月8日中國最高人民法院研究室回覆了一位網友的信訪建議，回覆提到「法律禁止基於性傾向、性別認同與性別表達的歧視，法院對性少數群體的合法權益予以平等保護」。
這是中國國家司法體系首次書面明確這一主張。很快地，這張圖迅速在網絡上傳播，端傳媒根據知情人核實確有其事。6月的聯合國人權理事會會議也提及此事，將其視為進步信號。
但壞消息隨之而來：事件在中國互聯網上引發關注後，相關信息迅速被審查刪除，發布消息的微信公眾號被炸號。「先讓你看到希望，再讓你明白希望本身就是違規內容」，有網友評論。
究竟該如何理解這些在同一個語境中出現的矛盾信號，在不同語境中出現的同一種人群？如何理解中國LGBTQ+群體的權益現狀？
我們邀請兩位常年關注這些問題的嘉賓來討論：Tom現為香港大學研究助理，專攻性別和法律，熟悉中國LGBTQ+法院判例的狀況。任浩是中國民間同志社群的組織者，有多年的行動經驗。
對談先從事實的層面出發，討論中國的法院是否做到了信訪回覆中提到的保護性少數權益，在過往LGBTQ+相關的司法案件中，有哪些灰色和彈性空間？從行動的角度看，在環境緊縮的當下，關心性少數權益的中國行動者們在做什麼，發展出什麼新的行動策略？
結合研究和行動的視角，我們不放大悲觀論調，但追問行動的可能。
你的支持，不可或缺
閱讀全文，歡迎成為會員 * 暢讀全站獲獎深度內容 * 領取專屬電子報及優惠 * 支持獨立媒體繼續報導 解鎖全文 已是會員？ 登入
Key Quotes
> This is the first time the national judicial system has explicitly stated this position in writing.
> First they let you see hope, then they make you understand that hope itself is prohibited content.
Tags
LGBTQ+
Social Issues
China
Human Rights
Law
Related Articles
* How Your Visa Application Became a Lucrative Business * A Trafficked Woman and the Bigamy Conviction She Has Carried for 37 Years * Belfast Riots: After a Stabbing, Algorithms Tear Open Northern Ireland's Unhealed Wounds | Whatsnew * Undercover in a Laos Tour Group: Uncovering Chinese Tourists' Illegal Consumption Chain of Endangered Wildlife * The Scorching World Cup: How Should Football Balance Commercial Interests and Player Safety? | Whatsnew * Peru's Tenth Presidential Election in a Decade: Left-Right Polarization and the Return of Fujimorism | What's New * Behind the 70 Billion Yuan Runaway Uncontrolled Industry: Who Is Preying on a Generation of Anxious Parents?
Make your daily reading actually fit you.A daily brief built from the sources you follow. Get started free HomeDiscoverWorld CupSettings