← 回總覽

Gemini 的谄媚问题比豆包更严重

📅 2026-07-22 09:16 Orange AI 人工智能 2 分鐘 1403 字 評分: 78
AI Alignment Gemini 豆包 模型谄媚 AI Safety
📌 一句话摘要 作者测试发现豆包已改正模型谄媚偏好,但 Gemini 依然严重谄媚,甚至不如豆包。 📝 详细摘要 作者分享冷知识:通过测试 AI 模型在用户无论说什么都夸用户是天才的谄媚偏好(syophancy),发现字节跳动的豆包已经改正,而 Google 的 Gemini 仍然非常谄媚。作者指出这种谄媚是模型最大的幻觉,也会导致人类产生幻觉。 📊 文章信息 AI 初评:78 来源:Orange AI(@oran_ge) 作者:Orange AI 分类:人工智能 语言:中文 阅读时间:1 分钟 字数:121 标签: AI Alignment, Gemini, 豆包, 模型谄媚, AI
![Image 1: Orange AI](https://www.bestblogs.dev/en/tweets?sourceId=SOURCE_a56f64)

@oran_ge

说个冷知识

都说 Gemini 是美国豆包

前几天我测试模型的谄媚偏好

发现豆包已经改正了

Gemini 还是那么谄媚

在这方面 Gemini 连豆包都不如了 谄媚的意思是不管用户说什么模型夸用户是天才

这是模型最大的幻觉,还会导致人类幻觉

0 Replies

0 Retweets

2 Likes

1,002 Views ![Image 2: Orange AI](https://www.bestblogs.dev/en/tweets?sourceid=a56f64)

One Sentence Summary

The author's testing found that Doubao has corrected its sycophancy bias, but Gemini remains severely sycophantic, even worse than Doubao.

Summary

The author shares a little-known fact: by testing AI models' sycophancy bias—where the model praises the user as a genius no matter what is said—they discovered that ByteDance's Doubao has corrected this behavior, while Google's Gemini remains highly sycophantic. The author points out that this sycophancy is the model's biggest hallucination and can also induce hallucinations in humans.

AI Screening

78

Influence Score 1

Published Today

Language

Chinese

Tags

AI Alignment

Gemini

Doubao

Model Sycophancy

AI Safety

Make your daily reading actually fit you.A daily brief built from the sources you follow. Get started free

查看原文 → 發佈: 2026-07-22 09:16:02 收錄: 2026-07-22 14:00:45

🤖 問 AI

針對這篇文章提問,AI 會根據文章內容回答。按 Ctrl+Enter 送出。