Search Ctrl+K
Change language Switch ThemeSign In
Curated Daily BriefWeekly PicksTopics SettingsHelp CenterCollapse
Narrow Mode
AI Agent Workflow Collaborating with Fable 5 and Codex
AI Agent Workflow Collaborating with Fable 5 and Codex
 宝玉@dotey
现在我很多复杂一点的任务都是 Fable 5 写方案,Codex 去执行,Fable 5 验收,相对来说可以做出比较靠谱的方案,以及兼顾性价比。具体是这么做的:
- Fable 5 的产出是技术方案文档(图1)
- 文档确认后在当前先 /compact 一次
- 把文档交给 Codex (GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh)去执行(图2)
- Codex 完成后让 Fable 验证(图3)
如果有些遗漏之类的,把 Fable 的反馈发回给 Codex(图4),不需要新开会话,在同一个 Codex 会话,Codex 会根据反馈继续完善。
---
如果用 Opus 5 替代 GPT 5.6 也可以,做法上可以跟上面一样新开会话,用文档传递上下文。
也可以直接让 Fable 5 开 SubAgent 并指定用 Opus 5 模型,并且要求在 SubAgent 完成任务后验证。
但是我执行下来 Opus 5 不如 GPT 5.6 Sol 稳定,也不如 GPT 5.6 Token 耐用,所以宁愿麻烦一点。Show More
Aug 3, 2026, 7:32 PM View on X
27 Replies
23 Retweets
142 Likes
11.8K Views  宝玉 @dotey
Follow
One Sentence Summary
The author details a multi-Agent collaboration workflow where Fable 5 handles proposal writing and verification, while Codex (GPT-5.6 Sol) handles execution, balancing solution quality and cost-effectiveness.
Summary
Baoyu shares his actual practice in complex tasks: first, Fable 5 generates a technical solution document, making it easy to annotate and for other Agents to get up to speed quickly; after document confirmation, he runs /compact to compress context to reduce subsequent costs; then he hands the document to Codex (GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh) for execution, adding /goal when needed to complete the task in one go; after completion, he lets Fable verify and iteratively improve based on feedback within the same Codex session; he also mentions that Opus 5 can be used as a replacement but is less stable and cost‑efficient than GPT-5.6 Sol. The post includes four operation screenshots, steps are clear and highly actionable.
AI Screening
88
Influence Score 64
Published Today
Language
Chinese
Tags
Fable 5
Codex
AI Agent Workflow
Multi-Agent Collaboration
Prompt Engineering
Make your daily reading actually fit you.A daily brief built from the sources you follow. Get started free HomeDiscoverSettings