← 回總覽

Cursor AI 承认博客中遗漏 Kimi 署名

📅 2026-03-21 03:42 Lee Robinson 人工智能 2 分鐘 1618 字 評分: 78
Cursor AI Kimi Composer 2 开源 AI 署名
📌 一句话摘要 Lee Robinson 承认 Cursor 本应在博客中提及 Kimi 作为基础模型,并承诺在未来的版本中改进署名。 📝 详细摘要 这条推文进一步讨论了 Cursor AI 推出 Composer 2 以及使用 Kimi-k2.5 作为底层模型的话题。Lee Robinson 明确承认,在最初的博客中未提及 Kimi 基础模型是一个错误。他重申了自己对开源的信念,并承诺在未来的版本中会 upfront 提及基础模型。Kimi_Moonshot 引用的推文确认,Cursor 通过 Fireworks AI 的托管平台访问 Kimi-k2.5,这是商业合作的一部分。这是关于
![Image 1: Lee Robinson](https://www.bestblogs.dev/en/tweets?sourceId=SOURCE_a5b19a28)

I'm a big believer in open source, especially as AI improves. It was a miss to not mention the Kimi base in our blog from the start. We'll fix that for the next model 🙏

Their team clarified our usage was licensed in the tweet below. x.com/Kimi_Moonshot/…N

199 Replies

107 Retweets

2,237 Likes

352.9K Views ![Image 2: Lee Robinson](https://www.bestblogs.dev/en/tweets?sourceid=a5b19a28)

One Sentence Summary

Lee Robinson admits Cursor should have mentioned Kimi as the base model in their blog and commits to improved attribution for future releases.

Summary

This tweet expands on the previous discussion about Cursor AI's Composer 2 launch and the use of Kimi-k2.5 as the underlying model. Lee Robinson explicitly acknowledges it was a mistake not to mention the Kimi base in their original blog post. He affirms his belief in open source and commits to mentioning the base model upfront in future releases. The quoted tweet from Kimi_Moonshot confirms that Cursor accesses Kimi-k2.5 via Fireworks AI's hosted platform as part of a commercial partnership. This represents a constructive exchange about proper attribution in the AI open ecosystem.

AI Score

78

Influence Score 402

Published At Yesterday

Language

English

Tags

Cursor AI

Kimi

Composer 2

Open Source

AI Attribution

查看原文 → 發佈: 2026-03-21 03:42:10 收錄: 2026-03-21 06:00:54

🤖 問 AI

針對這篇文章提問,AI 會根據文章內容回答。按 Ctrl+Enter 送出。